Spearman-Brown’s Predicted Reliability

Basic concepts

The Spearman-Brown correction is a specific form of the Spearman-Brown predicted reliability formula. Suppose we have a test with reliability ρ. The reliability ρ′ of the test replicated n times is given by the formula

Spearman-Brown predicted reliability

When n = 2, we have the Spearman-Brown correction for halves of equal length.

Alternative approach

Another way to view the Spearman-Brown formula is as follows: suppose that the reliability for a test with m items is ρ, then a test with mn items will have reliability ρ′.

Now suppose that the reliability of a test is ρ = .2 and suppose we have 5 such units (i.e. n = 5), thenSpearman-Brown predicted reliability

If n is increased to 10, then ρ′ = .714 and if n = 50, then ρ′ = .926. We see that the larger the number of units, the larger the reliability.

In fact, we can solve the above equation for n to determine how many units are required to achieve any specified reliability target (provided we know the value of ρ).

required number of items

Thus, if our goal is to achieve reliability of .75 we would need

solving for n

Thus, we would need a sample with 12 units to achieve the total reliability target.

Example

Example 1: Suppose that the split-half reliability is .5 based on a test with 12 questions. What will the predicted reliability be if you have 24 (comparable) questions? How many questions to you need to have to get a predicted reliability of .80?

First, we solve the Spearman-Brown predicted reliability formula for ρ as follows:

inverse of SB predicted reliability

ρ represents the reliability for one test unit (i.e. one question for this example).

Substituting the values ρ′ = .5 and n = 12, we get

SB predicted reliability calculation

Now we can calculate ρ′ using the Spearman-Brown predicted reliability formula when ρ = .0769 and n = 24.

Spearman-Brown predicted reliability

To achieve a predicted reliability of .80, we use the following approach

Calculation of nWorksheet Functions

Real Statistics Functions: The Real Statistics Resource Pack contains the following functions:

SB_PRED(m, rho, n) = Spearman-Brown predicted reliability based on m items when Spearman-Brown for n items is rho.

SB_SIZE(rho1, rho, n) = the number of items necessary to bring the Spearman-Brown predicted reliability up (or down) to rho1 from n items with Spearman-Brown of rho

We can get the answers for Example 1 by using the following formulas:

SB_PRED(24, .5, 12) = .667

SB_SIZE(.8, .5, 12) = 48

Halves of unequal length

The Spearman-Brown predicted reliability formula takes the following form when the two halves are not equal in length.

Suppose we have n comparable test units, where the correlation between any two of these units is ρ, then the (predicted) reliability for the sum of n1 units with the sum of the other n2 units (where n = n1 + n2) is

Spearman-Brown predicted reliability

References

Wikipedia (2016) Spearman-Brown prediction formula
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spearman%E2%80%93Brown_prediction_formula#:~:text=The%20Spearman%E2%80%93Brown%20prediction%20formula,after%20changing%20the%20test%20length.

Horst, P. (1951) Estimating total test reliability from parts of unequal length
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001316445101100306

Gebotys, R. (2003) Handout on reliability
https://studylib.net/doc/8088080/reliability-analysis

Nydick, S.W.  (2012) The relationship between Spearman-Brown and Cronbach’s alpha
https://swnydick.github.io/assets/reports/Spearman_Brown_and_Coefficient_Alpha.pdf

1 thought on “Spearman-Brown’s Predicted Reliability”

Leave a Comment